New Lead Paint Regulations are Here

peeling-lead-paint.jpg

On April 22, 2010 remodelers must comply with a new federal regulation pertaining to lead paint exposure. Supporters say it will protect them and their children from lead poisoning but many industry groups including the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) and the two big box retailers, Home Depot and Lowes are lobbying Congress and the White House to delay the rule's implementation, saying the government hasn't certified enough firms in government-approved techniques for handling lead-contaminated materials.

The EPA says lead-based paint was used in more than 38 million homes until the government banned it from housing in 1978. Although the average concentration of lead in the blood of young children has fallen sharply since then, EPA officials say too many are still being poisoned by lead-based paint in their homes. The agency says that from 1999 through 2004, roughly 285,000 children between the ages of one and five years were estimated to have elevated lead levels in their blood each year.

Contractors are concerned about higher costs associated with these new regulations which they will then have to pass along to consumers.

Should be interesting to watch how this plays out.

[via Wall Street Journal]

Charles & Hudson | Comments () |

 

 

  • Allison

    There needs to be some reason applied to this whole situation, though. We had our home tested and found out where the lead is and have worked to remove or cover most of it (or we just don't do remodeling in those areas until we get it cleaned up). The companies that want to come in with white suits on and charge you a fortune are the ones driving up the costs. If contractors take sensible measures the costs will only go up a little for their extra time and it defiitely is worth it. But stay away from the ones who use scare tactics. Here's a good link:

    http://www.oldhouseweb.com/how...

  • From everything I have seen, read, studied, etc... it is only going to drive up costs and probably not help one child out there.

  • I know that my clients continue to be concerned about this issue. Although it will be a cost for the consumer, I hope that it will be a positive step. If we are concerned about our children, this would be a good direction to go.

blog comments powered by Disqus



 

 

Copyright © 2012 Charles & Hudson LLC All Rights Reserved | Contact | Privacy Policy